Read the following excerpt from an e-mail sent by a CEO to 400 company managers at a high-technology company called Cerner. Reflect on the eight attributes of supportive communication and detail how you might apply those over the next 30 days in your job to avoid some of the problems associated with this communication.
“We are getting less than 40 hours of work from a large number of our K.C.-based EMPLOYEES. The parking lot is sparsely used at 8:00 A.M.; likewise at 5 P.M. As managers – you either do not know what your EMPLOYEES are doing, or you do not CARE. You have created expectations on the work effort that allowed this to happen inside Cerner, creating a very unhealthy environment. In either case, you have a problem and you will fix it or I will replace you. NEVER in my career have I allowed a team that worked for me to think they had a 40-hour job. I have allowed YOU to create a culture that is permitting this. NO LONGER.”
This topic is especially
relevant in today’s modern business environment. The issue of remote working and flexible
schedules tend to make such traditional metrics as the number of available parking
lot spaces not as reliable as they may once have been. Further, how does this CEO measure actual
output and production? Butts in seats or
deadlines met?
The other issue is the
idea that a 40 hour work week is somehow not enough for the liking of this
CEO. If the terms of employment that
hours are to be determined by the CEO, then he may have a point. But we all know that’s not the case.
As far as comparing this
note to the 8 attributes of effective listening, this may be the worst note
since the Zimmerman Telegram. Or as the
young kids may say these days, there’s a lot to unpack here.
There is NO
responsibility taken by the CEO OF the culture HE has created, not allowed the
managers to create. He was not very
specific as to how often he views this condition in the parking lot, nor is he
terribly specific regarding the productivity of the workforce and if there’s a
correlation between the two.
Nowhere in this memo is
any hint of supportive listening, or that he even approached or queried his
managers on such issues of parking lot spaces or productivity. He simply launches into an anger filled
threat that will likely prompt his managers to polish up their resumes when
they get home from work. I’m sure the
company Christmas party will be a joy.
From personal experience,
having seen a similar email from a former company CEO that actually utilized
varying font sizes, liberal underlining, and bold highlighting elicited more
chuckles at first due to the high marks for creativity, but groans later due to
the subsequent babysitting needed.
Needless to say, these types of emails tend to lessen the credibility of
the CEO and only sour an already unmotivated workforce.
Although a risky
proposition, one would love for the managers to call the CEO’s bluff by daring
him to fire all of them at once, thereby leaving the company basically
rudderless.
One can dream…
From a personal practice
perspective, I don’t think I could ever write such a strongly worded and threatening
letter to subordinates and expect any productive change in behavior. To me, when things are going sideways
organizationally, a manager has to discuss these matters face to face with
employees to get the full story, meaning body language, eye contact, language
and attitude of the speaker, to completely comprehend the situation. It is the only way to solve problems (not
attack people), find solutions and move forward.
Comments
Post a Comment