Frame Blindess
Shoemaker and Russo (in Hoch) discuss
the hazards associated with "frame blindness" and how to
guard against them. Discuss three ways you can avoid "framing
traps" and provide a detailed example of each from your life
experience. Could you have framed each situation differently? What did
the exercise teach you about complex decision-making? What additional tools or
"frames" might have helped you through the process? How was
"risk" a factor in your examples? What did you learn about yourself
through this exercise?
Of the various methods that Shoemaker and Russo (Hoch, et.
al., 2001) state to avoid framing traps, I have typically used surfacing a frame
most often when trying to suss out an issue.
I have found this technique the most effective in capturing and accounting
for as many risk elements that can be conceived. That said, risk identification is only as
effective as the knowledge, experience, and imagination of the people involved
in the exercise. Frame stretching or expansion
may help identify more areas of risk, but such an attempt may border on endless
“what if” scenarios. Aside from realizing
I wish the dry erase markers could smell like the old marker pens (orange,
cherry, blueberry), I do find that surfacing a frame provides the most complete
picture of an issue compared to other brainstorming methods.
Aligning frames as described by Shoemaker and Russo (Hoch,
et. al., 2001) can be a challenging but necessary exercise to prevent frame
blindness. More than looking to insert common
elements of frames, I tend to look strands or threads of commonality that permeate
between frames. I want to know what are
the attributes between these identified elements and are they visible in other
frames? A problem does arise when there
just isn’t any commonality between certain frames, although this can provide an
answer in and of itself and forces me onto the next element.
Appreciating emerging frames (Hoch, et. al., 2001) is
perhaps the most challenging of the three trap avoidance techniques discusses
here. Like every tech blog, odds maker,
or wannabe trendsetter, correctly identifying and giving proper weight to an
emerging frame can be a difficult exercise.
Cassone
(2014, p. 1) offers the concept of VUCA, which stands for volatile, unknown,
complex and ambiguous. This was
originally created to describe a multilateral world events model. Developed by the United States Army War
College in the 1990’s, the term has been adopted by business leaders to describe
“the chaotic, turbulent, and rapidly changing internal and external conditions
faced by organizations on a daily basis” (Cassone, 2014). The risk shown here is that a frame may emerge
and soon be rendered obsolete or useless.
Worse maybe the constant churn and “burned calories” in trying to constantly
identify such frames.
Cassone, M.
(2014). Characteristics of transformative listening enacted by organization
development practitioners
Hoch, S. J., Kunreuther, H.,
& Gunther, R. E. (2001). Wharton on making decisions (1st ed.). New
York: Wiley
Comments
Post a Comment