Collaborative Decision Making
Reflect on the role of
collaboration and getting to resolution in the process of decision-making. Rarely,
if ever, do our decisions affect only ourselves. Consider the importance of
getting other stakeholders involved; how can they help you make a better
decision for all?
Recall a specific
situation where you are faced with making a decision; within the context of the
information in this module’s reading, describe the process you went through and
the outcome you were seeking. How did stakeholder involvement help you make a
better decision? If stakeholders were not involved, could they have been?
Would that have led to a better resolution? Did you achieve your objective(s)?
Identify 3 ways you may use this learning experience to make better decisions
in the future.
Perhaps the most relevant situation has been our involvement
with recent church activities and fundraisers.
Although seemingly low stress and fun, having been tasked with running
the bar during the annual crab feed dinner presented unexpected challenges in
decision making and team building.
While the popular perception of the running the bar at a
church function is likely “C’mon, how hard can it be? Pour some drinks, collect some cash, and a
have a few beers while doing it? Where
do I sign up?”, it was a little more involved than that.
I was fortunate to have a couple of friends who gladly
volunteered to help, so to have some camaraderie and assistance for the evening
was great (and yes…we did have a few shots).
But what became apparent during the planning phase was that the actual
decisions on how much beer/wine/spirits to purchase, the size of the pour, as
well as pricing the menu was entirely up to me.
With not a lot of guidance from the organizers, I was left make these decisions
on my own.
Now since this was a church function, there is much less at stake
in terms of consequence and “customer satisfaction” versus in industry. If the wine is not a 2010 Clos du Bois
Merlot, well guess what, buddy – it’s the church crab feed. People are there to support the cause, so absolute
perfection is not a requirement.
However, what one realizes when organizing in these events
is how delicate the interaction between principals may need to be. Although conflict as discussed in Levine (2009)
may not necessarily be in play when planning such an event, it is in one’s
interest to tread lightly so that other volunteer’s boundaries are respected
and sensibilities are not offended.
However, the starting point of such interaction may be
closer “stories; telling and listening”, as stated by Levine (2009), simply to
learn and understand how things may have been done in prior years. So, when the time came to make decisions on
what to serve, how much to purchase, and what should be the price point, I made
a conscious effort to speak in a collaborative but firm manner with people. Sort of like – Here’s what I’m thinking, how does
that sound? Did I miss anything?
While such an approach may not be the most refined, one must
know their audience and understand the context of the interaction. We’re at a church function, so there’s no
need for paradigm shifts, scalability exercises or other MBA speak. Let’s just get the job done efficiently so
the evening goes really smooth and we can have some fun doing it. However, because
the of the volunteer nature of things, one may also feel the need to be especially
subtle and polite when engaging with others and assigning tasks.
While the decisions in this anecdote were relatively easy
and of low consequence, I though this an instructive example of how the
attributes and questions that Levine poses can be applied in a non-traditional
manner. A church function bar can be pretty
small grommet to jump through (or needle to thread) as a lot of factors may be
more exposed in a volunteer situation versus a professional work environment
that may require additional experience and resolution skill than otherwise considered.
Typically, volunteer events are a lot of fun, but the
planning and organizing side does present unique challenges that are similar to
that found in industry, but to a lesser degree.
However, good practices can be applied in a variety of situations when practiced
with a light touch.
PS – the bar earned over a $1,000 for the night…guess who was
designated as bartender for the 2019 crab feed…
Levine, S. (2009
). Getting to resolution: Turning conflict into resolution. (2nd edition).
Williston, VT: Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Comments
Post a Comment